The Master Planning Process
The San Ysidro School District contracted with the School Leaders to conduct an outreach effort and guide the District, its Staff, and its community through a process that would result in a master plan. The master plan will be a tool, used by the district, to collect the vision for the continued development and improvements of its facilities and campuses over the next 30 to 50 years.
At this point, it will be helpful to define what a master plan is. According to the California Department of Education, a Long Range Facilities Master Plan (FMP) is “a compilation of information, policies, and statistical data about a school district. It is organized to provide: 1) A continuous basis for planning educational facilities that will meet the changing needs of a community; and 2) Alternatives in allocating facility resources to achieve the district’s goals and objectives. It is used for planning facilities needs for either pupil enrollment growth or decline.” Further simplified, it is a road map that the Newport Mesa Unified School District will use to manage changes in facilities, your community, and how education is delivered.
It is also helpful to note what a Master Plan is NOT
It is NOT a tool that defines educational curriculum or programs. (It does define spaces and facilities that support existing or planned programs). It does NOT prioritize projects or define an implementation schedule. (It DOES however provide lists of all potential projects so that your board and community can begin the process of prioritizing work without the risk of invalidating future needed improvements.)
The 4 Stages of Master Planning
The District’s design consultants, School Leaders, conducted extensive site assessments of each district campus and facility. Included in the assessments were documented discussions and interviews with key site staff to learn about how facilities are used and how instruction and learning are conducted. Site assessments also included evaluations of the conditions of facilities, its site access, and other issues related to educational campus planning.
These outreach efforts were conducted both in-person and online. In-person sessions were conducted according to high school attendance boundaries over the course of five separate evenings. Invitations were extended to all members of the community, including students, parents, residents, staff, community members, public safety officials, local representatives, and others. These sessions conveniently allowed attendees to offer input and voice concerns for multiple campuses in one single evening. The results of the in-person sessions can be seen on the “facility feedback” portion each campus page.
The multi-step process conducted by the District has been documented into this website to provide the Newport-Mesa Unified School District and Community with access to the results of the process. Master Plans for each campus have been created in response to the feedback and assessments. Within this site you will see the results of the facility assessments and proposed solutions. The following steps and categories of analysis have been used to analyze each district site:
Program Confirmation
Review of the recently completed projects, past priorities, and program information. A review and validation of this criteria was addressed with the District leadership and principal of each campus. This program confirmation meeting with the site principal was valuable in the ultimate planning process to assure that the facilities on each campus can accommodate the District’s program goals.
Campus Site Planning
All relevant data, programming and facility needs identified were compiled into conceptual planning studies for each campus that were vetted with District leadership and site principals. From this iterative process of collaborative planning, a final campus master plan was developed for each campus identifying potential new facilities as well as the need for reconfiguration or modernization of existing facilities as needs suggested.
Conceptual Cost Estimating
The implementation of the Facilities Master Plan requires development of conceptual estimates of probable construction and development costs for each campus. This information includes target value costs for building and site development based on current market costs and escalated to a probable timeframe for construction. Soft costs are in addition to construction costs and cover District project management costs such as State agency approval fees (e.g. DSA), engineering, testing, inspection, furniture and equipment, etc. which are outside of the typical construction contract. These costs are included based on the District’s historical project delivery cost data to provide an overall projected Project Cost Budget for each campus.
Community Survey
The community will provide feedback on the proposed solutions through an integrated master plan survey. This digital tool will be used to refine and improve the master plan further in the future and to assist the community and board too set priorities.